Andy Polyakov wrote: >> Did you have time to look at this patch? > > No, unfortunately. Are you in hurry? If yes, what's the hurry?
No I'm not. I just wanted to move forward... >> Should I add/fix something? > > Windows support:-) Uh, eh, ... afterall I don't have a machine to test it on. > SHA-224 [which differs from SHA-256 only by initial > constants and truncated output]. I see. I'll look at it and send you the patch. > Test programs [extra -e argument perhaps]. ... to enable engines? Could be. But should it be run automatically during make? I guess no... > BTW, what's the deal with padlock engine in ./config -shared > configuration? It doesn't seem to be there... A. I don't know. I don't know much about the support infrastructure for engines. Any pointers where to look? Michal Ludvig -- * Personal homepage: http://www.logix.cz/michal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
