On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > >>Can you test if > >>http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14621 fixes the problem? > > > > > >Initial tests look good. I haven't seen a failure yet; I'm running a > >script to > >see if I can stress the problem into reappearing. > > http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14624 is "official" resolution for > the problem. Difference between first draft above and this one is that > "better safe than sorry" approach is applied to the rest of routines in > the module. A.
We had someone else report the problem and say that the patch fixed it: http://bugs.debian.org/339532 Kurt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
