> HP-UX fili B.11.00 U 9000/800 506700568 unlimited-user > license > > I am using gcc > gcc -v > Reading specs from > /opt/gcc/pa20_64/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/hppa64-hp-hpux11.00/3.0.2/specs > Configured with: ../gcc/configure > --prefix=/usr/local/pa20_64 --enable-languages=c,c++ > --host=hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 > --target=hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld > --with-gnu-as --enable-libstdcxx-v3 > Thread model: single > gcc version 3.0.2 > > The first time I made openssl with -O3 and make test > failed early on. > > The second time I made openssl with no optimization. > make test failed on test BN_add. > > The third time I made openssl with no optimization and > no-asm. make test still failed on test BN_add. > Attached is the output of make report form the build > with no optimization and no_asm. Please > save the attachment to disk and read it with vi.
I can't reproduce the problem with gcc 3.4.2. So it's either that your 3.0.2 is totally useless or it's some kind of local configuration problem, which we naturally can't help with. > Curiously, if I use the HP cc compiler, make and make > test both complete without errors. This is enough reason to dismiss this report as not OpenSSL problem, which I intend to do. You probably should turn to user community forum to see if somebody else has ran into similar problem... > But, I need to use the gcc compiler because other > applications using openss are built > with gcc (which I am not free to change) and they > require that openssl be built with the > same compiler. ... or talk to "them" who are making such demands. BTW, why don't "they" require OS libc to be built with same compiler then? I mean "all libraries has to be built with same compiler as application" is somewhat ungrounded demand. Cheers. A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
