I think so. At the very least, it points out that there's something that needs to be added.
My opinion, this is only my own opinion. -Kyle H On 12/1/06, Nils Larsch via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
via RT wrote: > Some X509v3 OIDs from RFC 2459 are currently missing from objects.txt: > > * X509v3 Certificate Issuer > * X509v3 Issuing Distribution Point > * X509v3 Subject Directory Attributes > > All the other OIDs from the RFC are already included in OpenSSL. The > attached patch introduces the above OIDs. does it really makes sense to add OIDs when openssl is not able to parse these extensions ? Cheers, Nils
______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
