Hello!
During the OpenSSL source investigation I found some strange call in
function BN_mod_inverse:
...
if (sign < 0)
{
if (!BN_sub(Y,n,Y)) goto err;
}
...
But! Declaration of BN_sub looks like this:
int BN_sub(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *b)
In some circumstances r will be expanded in BN_sub, so original call
"BN_sub(Y,n,Y)" breaks the rule of const.
--
Eugene.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
