Hello Andy, and thank you for your reply.

 On Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 16:05:44 +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:

> Could you collect disassembler output for offending code? I.e. run
> 'gdb test/sha512t core' (or rather util/shlib_wrap.sh gdb test/sha512t
> as you have build for shared), run 'where', note address, run
> 'disassemble' and advance to just noted address. Submit *complete*
> disassemble output from function start to offending instruction.

Thank you for the step-by-step procedure, as I'm not familiar at all
with gdb nor assembler. Disassembly of sha512_block_data_order() rebuilt
non-shared -O3 comes attached as sha512_block_data_order.asm.gz.


> Drop optimization level...

-O3 and -O2 segfault. -O1 and -O0 do work and test passes.


> Test attached patch.

| $ test/sha512t
| Testing SHA-512 ... passed.
| Testing SHA-384 ... passed.

Excellent! Your patch works at any optimization level. Much thanks to
you, Andy.


Alain.

Attachment: sha512_block_data_order.asm.gz
Description: application/gunzip

Reply via email to