> Now at last, there is only 48 bytes leak of (in 0.9.8k and 1.0.0 beta1 its > 36 bytes) of SSL_library_init(), is of not a big issue but I will > have look > into openssl to just as minimize as I can. (Because restarting the > application many times will slowly eat up the memory.. and will require to > restart the system)
Huh? What memory will it eat up exactly? When an application terminates, it can no longer map any memory. > Also One remaining thing is regarding invalid read/invalid write > messages, > Does compiling OpenSSL with -DPURIFY will cause any performance/stability > issue? OR is it necessary for good working of the application.? OR is it > just for the faint of the heart? Compiling with -DPURIFY is only needed to suppress bogus invalid read/write messages. If those messages bother you and you want them suppressed, compile with -DPURIFY. If you don't care and want maximum security, don't specify -DPURIFY. > Thanks, > msp DS ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
