2010/3/16, Kees Dekker via RT wrote: > * I saw a lot of NT4 code. It may be worth to consider that Windows > 2000 is not supported by Microsoft anymore for many years (see > http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071). You may > like to drop some ancient Windows flavors? It will save code too, e.g. > dynamically loading DLLs on e.g. Windows 9x variants (also very ancient).
Two facts: 1) W2k has not reached yet the end of the MS extended support period. 2) MicrosoftUpdate is, regularly, still providing security updates even for W2k professional. I do not agree with unconditionally removing W9x and W2k support from OpenSSL code base. Opt out, or opt in, conditional compilation support would be a different matter. -- -=[Yang]=- ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
