On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: >> [[email protected] - Fri Aug 27 11:34:17 2010]: >> >> Unfortunately, there was newer code which was not yet covered by the >> patch. This caused an abbreviated handshake to fail. >> > > Applied now, thanks. > > Note that since we need to retain binary compatibility between 1.0.0 and > 1.0.1 we will need to either avoid having to add a new field to ssl.h or > move it to the end of the structure. > > As things are any application accessing a field after the new member > would misbehave.
Do you need a patch which moves the "int renegotiate;" to the end of the struct for 1.0.1? -Robin ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
