Hi, found a few typos in the ca.1ssl manpage of Centos/RHEL 5.5.

Appear in upstream so I'm submitting here.
Short and unified diffs below against openssl-1.0.0c.tar.gz of 2nd December 
2010 (latest on website).

Filepath is openssl-1.0.0c/doc/apps/ca.pod

Thanks,
John.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ diff ca.pod ca_new.pod 
123c123
< Cerificate requests signed with a different key are ignored.  If
---
> Certificate requests signed with a different key are ignored.  If
240c240
< this option causes the -subj argument to be interpretedt with full
---
> this option causes the -subj argument to be interpreted with full
277c277
< In practive B<removeFromCRL> is not particularly useful because it is only 
used
---
> In practice B<removeFromCRL> is not particularly useful because it is only 
> used
633c633
< Cancelling some commands by refusing to certify a certificate can
---
> Canceling some commands by refusing to certify a certificate can
652c652
< this when the certificate is displayed then this will hand the requestor
---
> this when the certificate is displayed then this will hand the requester

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

$ diff ca.pod ca_new.pod -u
--- ca.pod      2009-04-10 12:25:53.000000000 +0100
+++ ca_new.pod  2011-01-13 12:39:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
 
 indicates the issued certificates are to be signed with the key
 the certificate requests were signed with (given with B<-keyfile>).
-Cerificate requests signed with a different key are ignored.  If
+Certificate requests signed with a different key are ignored.  If
 B<-spkac>, B<-ss_cert> or B<-gencrl> are given, B<-selfsign> is
 ignored.
 
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
 
 =item B<-multivalue-rdn>
 
-this option causes the -subj argument to be interpretedt with full
+this option causes the -subj argument to be interpreted with full
 support for multivalued RDNs. Example:
 
 I</DC=org/DC=OpenSSL/DC=users/UID=123456+CN=John Doe>
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
 B<certificateHold> or B<removeFromCRL>. The matching of B<reason> is case
 insensitive. Setting any revocation reason will make the CRL v2.
 
-In practive B<removeFromCRL> is not particularly useful because it is only used
+In practice B<removeFromCRL> is not particularly useful because it is only used
 in delta CRLs which are not currently implemented.
 
 =item B<-crl_hold instruction>
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
 option can be used. The behaviour should be more friendly and
 configurable.
 
-Cancelling some commands by refusing to certify a certificate can
+Canceling some commands by refusing to certify a certificate can
 create an empty file.
 
 =head1 WARNINGS
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@
 not taken then it can be a security risk. For example if a certificate
 request contains a basicConstraints extension with CA:TRUE and the
 B<copy_extensions> value is set to B<copyall> and the user does not spot
-this when the certificate is displayed then this will hand the requestor
+this when the certificate is displayed then this will hand the requester
 a valid CA certificate.
 
 This situation can be avoided by setting B<copy_extensions> to B<copy>

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to