On Feb 24, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Robert Story wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:46:49 -0500 Robert wrote:
> RS> I'm running an client/server application over DTLS, which works great
> RS> locally, but when we started testing over the net, things got a little
> RS> wacky. It appears that there is an issue somewhere with
> RS> fragmentation/reassembly. 
> 
> I was having trouble trying to get the recent DTLS patches to work with
> the CentOS/RHEL rpms, so I punted and built a vanilla 1.0.0d version
> from the tarball. I'm pleased to report that this problem no longer
> happens. I do still get a missed packet (or something), but the server
> no longer asserts, and it is only every 100 requests or so, instead of
> 10. I can live with that.
Hi Robert,

I assume with 'recent DTLS patches' you refer to the ones Robin has
posted today.

Could you elaborate a bit more on the problem you are still experiencing.
If possible, I would prefer that Robin tries to nail it down and fix it,
even if you can life with it.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> 
> Robert
> 
> --
> Senior Software Engineer
> SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Soloutions)

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to