Hi OpenSSL developers, We have found that Michal and Harald have worked on the SHA1/224/256 patch and RNG patch for VIA,
http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=122027889502874&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=115243758508970&w=2 but unfortunately, these patches have been not merged into the OpenSSL upstream now. In addition, we found some other people have pay attention to VIA Padlock JM submitted a SHA1/224/256 patch http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=128786191732264&w=2 Timo has propose some question about via-mont.pl http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=124945660509287&w=2 However, they never received any feedback on the list, so that I am confused whether I should resume Michal and Harald'work and submit other patches for VIA PadLock to OpenSSL. Therefore, I hope some OpenSSL developers can help me on the following questions: 1. If I resume the Michal and Harald' work on SHA1/224/256 patch and RNG patch, are you interested in it? 2. The"via-mont.pl"seems no to be used, is there any taboo against it or some bad history I are missing ? If yes, please tell me. 3. If I want to submit a patch which implements modular multiplication and modular exponentiation by calling VIA PadLock hardware instruction, should I write it in a individual Perl script like "via-mont.pl", or wrap it in the RSA/DSA method to be implemented in PadLock engine ? Or both are required? In any case, we are here to wait for your replies and we have time to do anything that can make the work go on. So please talk to me. Thanks very much for your attention and help. Brily 2011-05-16 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
