Hi Andy, Once again thank you. I tested 2 sample test explained in the FIPS 180-2 and 180-3 documents with OpenSSL 1.0.1 document and test output matched in both the cases. But the CH was different in FIPS 180-2 than FIPS 180-3. So I was wondering how output can be same irrespective of CH difference. I was not aware the document is corrupted.
I need to check how to get the right version of the document now. Thanks a lot for your timely input. Regards Jaya -----Original Message----- From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Andy Polyakov Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:07 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL > Thanks a lot for the quick reply. Sorry to interrupt you with one more > question. Is > http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2.pdf this > not the right document? It appears to be right place, but the document is corrupted. I have a copy from 2004 that says (x&y)^(~x&z). My PDF has same about of pages, layout appears identical, but it's 6.6 times smaller. How do I know which one is corrupted? Well, implement your routine according to above URL and see if its output matches test vectors presented in that very document. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
