On 20 May 2014 15:17, Ken Goldman <kgold...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On 5/20/2014 7:24 AM, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> There is already a strndup replacement: BUF_strndup(). Switching to >> use that would be better. > > > However > > - if that function points to strndup, don't you still have the problem if > strndup doesn't exist?
It doesn't. > - if that function is a reimplementation of strndup, don't you lose any > optimizations that the tool chain strndup might have made? Yes, you do. I guess if anyone really cares (its not actually used much), then it would be possible to work around. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
