I'm totally willing to cooperate on this, and may have enough skills to do it.
Do you think it could be possible for us to collaborate on this topic? Thank you, Fedor. On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Andy Polyakov via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd still pull Adam's changes, at least for consistency reasons. Other > > assembly files seems to be using signed comparison for the same kinds of > > operations. > > > > What do you think about it? > > I think it's appropriate to harmonize branches with interface. But it > takes deal of concentration and unfortunately for this moment I'm > limited in time. As mentioned, solution is *interim* and I leave the > ticket open with intention to come back to it and resolve it by > double-checking all modules, harmonizing branches and implementing > bn_mul_mont_eligible (or similar). > > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
