Hello,
Yes, I can make without "make depend", but make check fails with "Failed AES256-GCM-SHA384", if I specify "no-ssl3". Without "no-ssl3", make check passes. I tried 4 patterns of Configure parameters, and got the same result. - solaris-x86-cc threads shared zlib no-ssl3 - solaris64-x86_64-cc threads shared zlib no-ssl3 (cc is "solarisstudio12.3/bin/cc") - solaris-x86-gcc threads shared zlib no-ssl3 - solaris64-x86_64-gcc threads shared zlib no-ssl3 (gcc version 4.8.3) Regards, --- Kiyoshi <yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp> ----- Original Message ----- >From: Stephen Henson via RT <r...@openssl.org> >To: yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp >Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org >Date: 2014/10/16, Thu 21:50 >Subject: [openssl.org #3566] openssl-1.0.1j make depend failes > >On Thu Oct 16 14:22:19 2014, yoi_no_myou...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to build openssl-1.0.1j with "no-ssl3", but can not. >> >> >> ./Configure --prefix=/opt/local/openssl solaris-x86-cc threads shared >> zlib no-ssl3 >> >> Got message: >> >> --- from here, message --- >> >> Since you've disabled or enabled at least one algorithm, you need to >> do >> the following before building: >> >> make depend >> >> Configured for solaris-x86-cc. >> >> --- till here, message --- >> > >Obviously this needs fixing but as a workaround: if you're building from >scratch (or after "make clean") it should compile fine with without doing "make >depend". > >Steve. >-- >Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. >Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
