On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > AES 128 is worth supporting.
Not for me; doing this strictly for fun. Note: With this patch, expanding an AES-256 key is faster than expanding an AES-128 key. So why not just use those saved cycles to switch to AES-256? Cf. djb's "matching AES security," http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/current/msg04820.html ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
