> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Stephan Mueller
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 15:00
<snip>
> I agree allowing to choose an arbitrary e is not so good. However, what
kind
> of threats do you see when we would:
> 
> - use 2**16+1 per default
> 
> - allow 17 (-F4) as a legacy
> 
F4 is 2**16+1=65535. 
2**4+1=17 is F4 and is not currently supported in genrsa (but see next)

> - allow arbitrary e as long as they are odd and larger than 2**16-1
> 
> - disallow anything else.
> 
Note genpkey already supports setting rsa_keygen_pubexp and is recommended 
for new uses over legacy genrsa as well as gendsa and ecparam -genkey .



______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to