On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:11:34 +0100 Hubert Kario <[email protected]> wrote:
> they don't differ... oh sorry, must've pasted the wrong string. But please ignore my first patch, I don't think this is optimal. I'll do another one later. What I think is a sane approach is to leave the current code mostly as it is, just add one further sorting step that will bring GCM ciphers in front of non-gcm ones. I think that should give the desired result. -- Hanno Böck http://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: [email protected] GPG: BBB51E42
pgp99F4AWZVtw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
