On 20 January 2015 at 21:44, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > you think is still necessary to leave in the code #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SHA > > and #ifdef OPENSSL_NO_SHA are so many function calls EVP_sha1() (and > > other similar) that compiling with -DOPENSSL_NO_SHA gives an endless > > series of errors and warnings. > > Right, it's not useful. We're looking at cleaning up a whole bunch of > OPENSSL_NO_xxx options that don't really work. Details to come. >
If you're going to change this, then perhaps at the same time as changing the API these could be inverted so we have defines that say what /is/ enabled since that's probably a better design overall. Rich.
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
