> On Jun 9, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Zooko Wilcox-OHearn <zo...@leastauthority.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: >> So if you're going to replace md5sum... which one should you use? Which ONE >> HASH should replace MD5? > > I'd suggest blake2sp. It's currently the fastest on my machine, and I > guess that there will often be multiple cores in systems where hash > performance matters (i.e. hashing large files or many files).
As a replacement for md5sum (like it says in the title) - I agree. If we also want blake for protocols (like TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_BLAKE or something), the non-parallel versions would be more suitable. Yoav _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
