+1 -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
From: Ben Laurie [mailto:b...@links.org] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:15 AM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] Continuous Integration for OpenSSL On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 09:53 Alessandro Ghedini <alessan...@ghedini.me<mailto:alessan...@ghedini.me>> wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:55:43am +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > Thanks! We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build farm. > The more the merrier. I am sure ARM would be appreciated. Does this mean that you are not oging to enable Travis CI? If anything this buildfarm didn't seem to catch the 25efcb44 build failure. Additionally Travis automatically builds pull requests submitted on GitHUb, in order to give immediate feedback to submitter and reviewer. So I think it still makes sense to have Travis alongside this Cisco buildfarm (as you said, the more the merrier), but if you don't agree then both #63 and #373 pull requests can be closed (if anything, two less open PRs...). I've just +1'ed #373 - if another OpenSSL dev will also do that, I'll push it...
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
