On 30/09/15 10:22, Alessandro Ghedini via RT wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:01:54am +0000, Rich Salz via RT wrote: >> We fixed this in a slightly different way. We made BIO_new_file and >> BIO_s_file >> return an alternate implementation that returns run-time failures. Almost all >> of the OpenSSL code uses the BIO object, so we didn't have to remove that. We >> did #ifdef out any routine that had a "FILE*" param or local variable. > > Note that commit 984d6c6 causes mingw shared builds to fail again: > https://travis-ci.org/openssl/openssl/jobs/82855661 > > The problem seems to be that entries 4991 and 4992 in libeay.num are used > twice. >
Fixed: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dd35486db671dca36caffecc7ee1f5f6483b3a4b > Since this is not the first time this happens, I was thinking that maybe > having > a test for this would be useful. Good idea: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5530d5187c77877b610b11c4aadedd7107386afa Matt _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
