On Friday 09 October 2015 18:05:19 Matt Caswell via RT wrote: > On 09/10/15 19:02, Hubert Kario via RT wrote: > > And for good measure, I also created a test script that > > combines fragmentation with interleaving. > > Did you try my patch with it? And if so what happened?
I'm using interleave-data-102.patch attached to this ticket. So, for state-machine-rewrite branch it doesn't apply, there's no ssl/s3_pkt.c file. For current 1.0.1 branch, the patch applies, test case results are as follows: * test-openssl-3712.py - pass * test-interleaved-application-data-in-renegotiation.py - pass * test-interleaved-application-data-and-fragmented-handshakes-in- renegotiation.py - pass For current 1.0.2 branch, the patch applies, tests case results are as follows: * test-openssl-3712.py - pass * test-interleaved-application-data-in-renegotiation.py - pass * test-interleaved-application-data-and-fragmented-handshakes-in- renegotiation.py - pass for current master the patch doesn't apply, just like with state- machine-rewrite there's no ssl/s3_pkt.c file Note: the two latter test cases need the s_server run in -www mode, the first test case ignores server response so will work regardless, that may be why Alessandro testing doesn't show the issue as fixed -- Regards, Hubert Kario Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev