On 10/22/2015 01:02 PM, stefan.n...@t-online.de via RT wrote: > Hi, > > Wouldn't > if ( UINTPTR_MAX - (uintptr_t) buffer < len) > be closer to the intention of the original check? > Or is this undefined behaviour as well and I > stupidly missed that fact? >
That appears to be defined behavior, but the intention of the original check is not particularly well-specified. The committed version should be sufficient; there does not seem to be a reason to change it again. -Ben _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
