On Monday 09 November 2015 17:00:45 Kaduk, Ben via RT wrote: > On 11/09/2015 08:41 AM, Hubert Kario via RT wrote: > > Looks like rekeying is on the table again for TLSv1.3: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg18295.html > > The proposed rekeying mechanism is not looking like renegotiation... > > > so I'd say this issue should get fixed or at least workarounded > > (allowed in case the identity doesn't change) > > ...so it's not at all clear that it bears any relevance to this > ticket.
it means that the postgres expectation for such functionality won't go away and its behaviour cannot be dismissed as "doing a silly thing" -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
