In message <564846e4.4060...@artisanlogiciel.net> on Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:48:36 +0100, pl <p...@artisanlogiciel.net> said:
pl> On 14/11/2015 18:32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: pl> > The proposed list was: pl> > pl> > CAST pl> > IDEA pl> > MDC2 pl> > MD2 [ already disabled by default ] pl> > RC5 [ already disabled by default ] pl> > RIPEMD pl> > SEED pl> > WHIRLPOOL pl> > ALL BINARY ELLIPTIC CURVES pl> > pl> > If I were to guess, it would be that the base crypto implementations pl> > of IDEA, SEED and binary elliptic curves need to stay. We could pl> > perhaps get away with removing CAST and RIPEMD. No idea about the pl> > rest. pl> > pl> pl> It is perhaps time to split crypto library in two libraries pl> libcryptolegacy and libcryptostrong... pl> pl> My two cents. I though could be to make a "legacy" engine that holds the removed crypto algos. It could be maintained outside of mainstream OpenSSL, really by anyone... Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
