> It looks like in the #ifndef SIGALRM case, c[D_GHASH][0] is set, but not > c[D_GHASH][i] for larger i.
Fixed in master. > (Where is the no-SIGALRM code used?) Nowhere 99.9999997% cares about. Originally it was used extensively on Windows (i.e. among those majority cared about), but then even that switched to equivalent of asynchronous alarm. Closing ticket. Thanks. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4230 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
