If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good, then it's time to close this ticket. You decide.
Cheers, Richard Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.29, skrev beld...@gmail.com: > Dear Richard, > > The patch you suggested seems not to break at least self-compatibility for > the smime -enc command. > Is this enough or should I do some more tests? > > Thank you! > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Dear Richard, > > > > Sorry for the delay. I am out of office now so I will check it some days > > later. > > > > > > On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Richard Levitte via RT <r...@openssl.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Did that help, can we close this ticket now? > >> > >> Vid Ons, 17 Feb 2016 kl. 11.25.26, skrev levitte: > >> > May I suggest that you use EVP_CIPHER_set_asn1_iv() and/or > >> > EVP_CIPHER_get_asn1_iv()? With a temporary ASN1_TYPE to which you > >> > assign > >> > gcp->iv, that should be perfectly possible, no? > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Richard > >> > > >> > Vid Ons, 17 Feb 2016 kl. 09.53.04, skrev beld...@gmail.com: > >> > > Dear Richard, > >> > > > >> > > I am not sure it will not break the compatibility. > >> > > Both implementations of the GOST ciphers require access to this > >> > > field. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Richard Levitte via RT > >> > > <r...@openssl.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm sorry, the oiv field is EVP private. Sure, it's been accessible > >> > > > (and > >> > > > thoroughly misused in some cases) when EVP_CIPHER_CTX was open, but > >> > > > in > >> > > > essence, > >> > > > it's a EVP private store of the IV that was given at > >> > > > EVP_CipherInit(). > >> > > > > >> > > > If you want to retain a copy of the original IV, I suggest you have > >> > > > one in > >> > > > GOSTs structure and take a copy of the IV given to the init() > >> > > > function. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thank you for the reminder, I meant to deal with this further. oiv > >> > > > should > >> > > > really not be publically accessible at all, not even as a constant. > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheers, > >> > > > Richard > >> > > > > >> > > > Vid Sat, 23 Jan 2016 kl. 09.40.19, skrev beld...@gmail.com: > >> > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > After making the EVP_CIPHER_CTX struct opaque I found that there > >> > > > > is a > >> > > > > missing non-const accessor to the oiv member. It is used in GOST > >> > > > > engine > >> > > > > when we set the cipher parameters from the ASN1 parameters. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thank you! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Richard Levitte > >> > > > levi...@openssl.org > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267 > >> > > > Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Richard Levitte > >> > levi...@openssl.org > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Richard Levitte > >> levi...@openssl.org > >> > >> -- > >> Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267 > >> Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted > >> > >> > > > > -- > > SY, Dmitry Belyavsky > > > > > -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
