Hi Jeff, Just for information, I send a patch and had a previous exchange about this with Rich :
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/openssl-org-4178-patch-OpenSSL-1-1-0-fails-when-configure-with-no-nextproto-td61662.html Regards, Michel. -----Message d'origine----- De : openssl-dev [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Jeffrey Walton Envoyé : lundi 21 mars 2016 09:42 À : OpenSSL Developer ML Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg > Thank you very much. That leads to: gcc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_DYNAMIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DOPENSSLDIR="\"/usr/local/ssl\"" -DENGINESDIR="\"/usr/local/lib64/engines\"" -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC -Iinclude -I. -MMD -MF ssl/t1_ext.d.tmp -MT ssl/t1_ext.o -c -o ssl/t1_ext.o ssl/t1_ext.c ssl/t1_ext.c: In function SSL_extension_supported : ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: error: TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg undeclared (first use in this function) case TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg: ^ ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in Makefile:5954: recipe for target 'ssl/t1_ext.o' failed -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
