On Po, 2016-04-25 at 13:08 +0000, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
> rsalz> > If nothing else, all the RSA_set0 routines should test if
> the same pointer
> rsalz> > value is being replaced if so do not free it.
> rsalz> >
> rsalz> > The same logic need to be done for all the RSA_set0_*
> functions as well as
> rsalz> > the DSA_set0_* functions.
> rsalz>
> rsalz> That seems like a bug we should fix.
>
> No, it's by design:
>
Then perhaps there should be a function to set only the private part of
the RSA and DSA keys?
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4518
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
