Ok. FYI, we decided to remove openssl.spec from master (i.e. upcoming 1.1.0), as it really belongs with the packagers rather than with us. The 1.0.1 series will not be fixed, as it's at its last year before EOL, and we only do security fixes on it. The 1.0.2 series is a viable target, though, and I'll gladly apply your changes there (with some mods)...
Cheers, Richard On Fri May 06 13:26:03 2016, john.with...@irs.gov wrote: > (Replying to you instead of to the list as I can't ...) > > That was an oversight on my part. As part of the porting process, I > was removing as many potential variables as possible. I neglected to > reinstate that code before posting the file. > > I apologize for any confusion. > > John Withers > Enterprise Operations > Directory Services Branch - OS:CTO:EO:ISD:DSB:PKI > Champaign, Illinois > > Phone: (217) 974-7736 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Levitte via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:13 AM > To: Withers John Z > Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: [openssl.org #4522] Update to openssl.spec supplied with > 1.0.1s > > Vid Thu, 05 May 2016 kl. 13.57.47, skrev rs...@akamai.com: > > > > > > 1.0.1 is at end-of life and is only getting security fixes for the > > rest of the year. > > 1.0.2 is LTS and maybe this needs to be ported there (and master) as > > well? > > master, without a doubt. I think 1.0.2 as well. > > There's one think I must question though... the attached openssl.spec > removes > all the architecture variants. Why? > > Cheers, > Richard > > -- > Richard Levitte > levi...@openssl.org > > -- > Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4522 > Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted > -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4522 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
