> Or.... could it be assumed that an SHA 512 implementation has innate support > for the truncated version like SHA 512/256 ? And so, it does hold good for > OpenSSL too?
Both yes and no. Yes in sense that given low-level interface application is actually capable of producing desired result (you can replace initial values prior actual hashing and truncate result), and no in sense that there is no high-level interface and the said low-level programming won't be considered as supported. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev