On Mon Jul 11 11:34:35 2016, mattias.ell...@physics.uu.se wrote: > I guess having a more restrictive accessor that only sets the > EXFLAG_PROXY bit could work. I suggested the more general solution of > having set/clear accessors for arbitrary flags since it was - well > more > general.
So let me ask this in a different manner, does OpenSSL 1.1 still not set the EXFLAG_PROXY flag correctly? In what situations does that happen? That may be worth a bug report of its own. -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4602 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
