> The following change introduced build problems: > >> + if (vec[1]&0x00008) OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P[0] |= SPARCV9_VIS4; > > ... here we use vec[1], so the compiler warns: > > crypto/sparcv9cap.c:179:20: warning: array subscript is above array > bounds [-Warray-bounds] > if (vec[1]&0x00008) OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P[0] |= SPARCV9_VIS4; > ^
Fixed. > need the following patch to crypto/sparcv9cap.c here (warning "implicit > declaration of function '_sparcv9_fjaesx_probe'"): > > @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ > void _sparcv9_fmadd_probe(void); > unsigned long _sparcv9_rdcfr(void); > void _sparcv9_vis3_probe(void); > +void _sparcv9_fjaesx_probe(void); > unsigned long _sparcv9_random(void); > size_t _sparcv9_vis1_instrument_bus(unsigned int *, size_t); > size_t _sparcv9_vis1_instrument_bus2(unsigned int *, size_t, size_t); Being fixed. Thanks for report. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev