On 01/09/2017 10:05 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Should we move to using SIPHash for the default string hashing > function in OpenSSL? It’s now in the kernel > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/9/619 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lkml.org_lkml_2017_1_9_619&d=DwMFAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=pP5nqGH-O2jy9bgGMmoCbXCc1O46ngqbhe5RSSkFBe8&s=pUULb5vMnjiMFb0kcqwJSHvwKh1G0vQZXwDDYnXNCA8&e=> > > Overview at https://131002.net/siphash/ > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__131002.net_siphash_&d=DwMFAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=pP5nqGH-O2jy9bgGMmoCbXCc1O46ngqbhe5RSSkFBe8&s=7y76cbQkDMaUqyjBZmNMndmATnk9tUPu8I8JxeD1bKE&e=> > >
Instead of this? %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% /*- unsigned char b[16]; MD5(c,strlen(c),b); return(b[0]|(b[1]<<8)|(b[2]<<16)|(b[3]<<24)); */ n = 0x100; while (*c) { v = n | (*c); n += 0x100; r = (int)((v >> 2) ^ v) & 0x0f; ret = (ret << r) | (ret >> (32 - r)); ret &= 0xFFFFFFFFL; ret ^= v * v; c++; } return ((ret >> 16) ^ ret); %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Heck, yes! -Ben
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev