> Pseudorandomness of the output has been a design goal/requirement only > in SHA-3 family. Any prior hash function’s exhibition of this property is > coincidental. > > Therefore I suggest using SHA3 instead.
Is pseudorandomness a requirement? Or is it the "50% chance of a bitflip"? -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
