> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] Im Auftrag von > Richard Levitte > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2017 15:29 > An: openssl-dev@openssl.org > Betreff: Re: [openssl-dev] Plea for a new public OpenSSL RNG API > > In message <e6faf983220642c192bba281b9b32...@ex13.ncp.local> on Tue, 29 Aug > 2017 13:27:20 +0000, "Dr. > Matthias St. Pierre" <matthias.st.pie...@ncp-e.com> said: > > Matthias.St.Pierre> > Essentially, the argument for your last remark is > in-structure vtable > Matthias.St.Pierre> > vs refered to vtable. I tend to prefer the latter (and > that's the > Matthias.St.Pierre> > usual OpenSSL pattern too, even though there are > exceptions). > Matthias.St.Pierre> > Matthias.St.Pierre> You are the experts and much more familiar with > Matthias.St.Pierre> the code then I am. My role was only to give the > Matthias.St.Pierre> starting shot, the rest is up to you. > > Fair enough! :-)
Just a sudden inspiration: If the RAND_DRBG becomes a truly independent API it might be better to strip the RAND_ prefix and redesign the API such that one has - a DRBG_CTX structure for the data members - a DRBG_METHOD structure for its methods Would this look more OpenSSL-like to you? Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
