I think the change is justified. — Regards, Uri > On Jan 16, 2018, at 14:31, Sands, Daniel <dnsa...@sandia.gov> wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 14:50 +0000, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: >> OpenSSL defines it as a SET OF and the spec says it’s a SEQUENCE >> OF. Ouch! Will that cause interop problems if we change it? (I >> don’t remember the DER encoding rules) >> >> >> > > Well, a SEQUENCE uses tag 16 while a SET uses tag 17, according to a > quick reference I found. So that could be an interoperability concern. > But maybe this is the first actual use of nested safecontents, since > this difference flew under the radar for so long :) > -- > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
