In master and OpenSSL_1_1_0-stable we have: commit df8c39d52256c2e5327a636928b6d1ed05f695a2 Author: Rich Salz <rs...@openssl.org> Date: Tue Sep 30 17:30:19 2014 -0400
RT3549: Remove obsolete files in crypto Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <ap...@openssl.org> crypto/bn/asm/x86/add.pl | 76 ------ crypto/bn/asm/x86/comba.pl | 277 -------------------- crypto/bn/asm/x86/div.pl | 15 -- crypto/bn/asm/x86/f | 3 - crypto/bn/asm/x86/mul.pl | 77 ------ crypto/bn/asm/x86/mul_add.pl | 87 ------- crypto/bn/asm/x86/sqr.pl | 60 ----- crypto/bn/asm/x86/sub.pl | 76 ------ 36 files changed, 5815 deletions(-) All the crypto/bn/asm/x86/*.pl are deleted, but they are still required by: $ head -n18 crypto/bn/asm/x86.pl #! /usr/bin/env perl # ... copyright ... push(@INC,"perlasm","../../perlasm"); require "x86asm.pl"; require("x86/mul_add.pl"); require("x86/mul.pl"); require("x86/sqr.pl"); require("x86/div.pl"); require("x86/add.pl"); require("x86/sub.pl"); require("x86/comba.pl"); Is that file obsolete also? Is there no need for asm support for "bn" on x86? -- Viktor. _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project