On 28/02/18 17:09, Andy Polyakov wrote: >>>> I'd like to request more opinions on >>>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5427. Key dispute question is >>>> whether or not following fragment should work >>>> >>>> unsigned char *inp = buf, *out = buf; >>>> >>>> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++) { >>>> EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out, &outl, inp++, 1); >>>> out += outl; >>>> } >>> >>> This should work. >> >> On second thought, perhaps not. > > It seems that double-clarification is appropriate. As it stands now it > *does* work. So question is rather if it should keep working [and if > not, is it appropriate that stops working in minor release].
It should continue to work and must not stop in a minor release. Matt _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
