On 26/06/18 18:18, Salz, Rich wrote:
> So are you saying look at the 73 open issues at 
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/9 and re-evaluate them?

Exactly. My guess is that a significant proportion of them also apply to
1.1.0 and therefore should not hold up the 1.1.1 release. At the moment
though it is impossible to tell which are the high priority issues we
should be focussing on.

Matt


> 
> 
> 
> On 6/26/18, 11:56 AM, "Matt Caswell" <m...@openssl.org> wrote:
> 
>     I'm thinking that we should maybe re-asses the current milestones in 
> github.
>     
>     We currently use the following milestones:
>     
>     Assessed - Anything against this milestone isn't relevant to the 1.1.1
>     release (e.g. 1.0.2 specific issue)
>     
>     1.1.1 - This is relevant to the 1.1.1 release but may not be specific to
>     it (e.g. an issue that affects both 1.1.1 and 1.1.0)
>     
>     Post 1.1.1 - Feature request to be looked at once 1.1.1 is released
>     
>     
>     I think we should re-asses everything currently against the 1.1.1
>     milestone so that anything which isn't specific to that release gets
>     moved to the "Assessed" milestone.
>     
>     At the moment its difficult to see the "wood for the trees" between
>     issues which are newly introduced and those that are long standing. In
>     terms of getting the 1.1.1 release out the door we should focus on the
>     former.
>     
>     Thoughts?
>     
>     Matt
>     
>     _______________________________________________
>     openssl-project mailing list
>     openssl-project@openssl.org
>     https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-project mailing list
> openssl-project@openssl.org
> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
> 
_______________________________________________
openssl-project mailing list
openssl-project@openssl.org
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Reply via email to