This type of API-braking change should be reserved for something like 3.0, not a patch release.
Despite it being a "incorrect", it is expected behavior. -- -Todd Short // tsh...@akamai.com // “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet." > On Mar 26, 2020, at 11:03 AM, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre > <matthias.st.pie...@ncp-e.com> wrote: > > I agree, go ahead. > > Please also consider reverting the change for the 3.0 alpha release as well, > see Daniel Stenbergs comment > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11378#issuecomment-603730581 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_issues_11378-23issuecomment-2D603730581&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=djWoIIXyggxwOfbwrmYGrSJdR5tWm06IdzY9x9tDxkA&e=> > > Matthias > > > From: openssl-project <openssl-project-boun...@openssl.org> On Behalf Of > Dmitry Belyavsky > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 3:48 PM > To: Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> > Cc: openssl-project@openssl.org > Subject: Re: 1.1.1f > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:14 PM Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org > <mailto:m...@openssl.org>> wrote: > The EOF issue (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11378 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_issues_11378&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=MAiLjfGJWaKvnBvqnM4fcyvGVfUyj9CDANO_vh4wfco&e=>) > has > resulted in us reverting the original EOF change in the 1.1.1 branch > (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11400 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_pull_11400&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=3hBU2pt84DQlrY1dCnSn9x1ah1gSzH6NEO_bNRH-6DE&e=>). > > Given that this seems to have broken quite a bit of stuff, I propose > that we do a 1.1.1f soon (possibly next Tuesday - 31st March). > > Thoughts? > > I strongly support this idea. > > -- > SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
