On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process > > -1 > > Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0 > release? > > I think we need some sort of definition of missing features.
Some features (e.g. SRP) were deliberately excluded from 3.0, but I tend to treat all the other features available in 1.1.1 and missing in 3.0 as bugs. -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
