Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> The shared library support in SSLeay/OpenSSL is still very ugly and
> inconsistent. Actually in the future is should be integrated back into the
> Configure script and the Makefiles as it's the case for Apache. When you've
> good suggestions send them to us. My current idea is at least a "shlib" or
> "dso" argument for Configure which triggers the generation of libcrypto.so and
> libssl.so instead of libcrypto.a and libssl.a. Ben, you're already working the
> Configure stuff, have you perhaos done something in this area, too?
No, I'm afraid not. But whatever we do, please, let's try to keep it
simple!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
