-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
> "William H. Geiger III" wrote:
> > I am rather confused as to why Red Hat would go with a closed,
> > proprietary crypto library instead of going with OpenSSL, doesn't
> > seem to be the Linux way.
>
> Ah, but is Red Hat the Linux way?
Very much so, they have released everything they have written under
the GPL. Only the Debian people have a better record.
There may be an exception in the case of their "Secure Web Server"
product, but I believe that is to comply with the export laws and RSA
licensing.
Regards,
Damien Miller
- --
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4LexeormJ9RG1dI8RAhCnAKC90rf4ItHHP71UFqxaitLnRpczsgCg3Gfd
H+iRe5k9DUlNIu7e+PY6QD4=
=tw6m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
