Rich Salz wrote:
>
> An interesting question. Should it be PGP-signed? Well, since it's an
> X.509-based system, that wouldn't look great.
Eh? Just coz we're stuck with X.509 for SSL doesn't mean we have to
depart from common sense and use it for anything else, does it?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
ApacheCon 2001! http://ApacheCon.com/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
