On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lance Paine wrote:
> I'm in agreement, there is a reason that most mailers have a "Reply-All" or
> "Reply-Group" function after all. Don't munge Reply-To!
Well, if it's *replacing* Reply-to: on incoming mail, that's definitely
broken. However it is perfectly reasonable for a list reflector to *add*
this header, and I appreciate the service.
Besides, I'm getting a nice list of virus-scanner companies that don't
know how to write proper autoresponders. :-/
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make a good day.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
