Yes, I am probably mistaken in that regard about the status of Net::SSLeay. I believe it was actually shelved for a while, and then picked up again, but this was some time ago and memory may not serve me. In any case, the issue is not operability with openssl, but with LWP. And as you can see from my previous email, it is best to use Crypt::SSLeay with LWP, at least according to the author of LWP.
Keary Suska Esoteritech, Inc. "Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet" > From: Marko Asplund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:12:14 +0200 (EET) > To: OpenSSL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: https > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Keary Suska wrote: > >> ... >> I would recommend that you remove Net::SSLeay and install Crypt::SSLeay. The >> former is no longer being maintained (and is considered deprecated), and may >> not function properly with newer openssl versions, but the latter is being >> actively maintained and I have been having good results from it. > > i'm using the latest Net::SSLeay version (1.08) with no problems and it > does support OpenSSL v0.9.6b quite well. Net::SSLeay is maintained and not > depricated at all, IMHO. > > -- > aspa > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
