In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:13:31 +0100, "Folkert van
Heusden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
folkert> I found out (yes, the rought way) that openssl is not
folkert> thread-safe: 2 threads doing encryption & decryption
folkert> concurrent goes horribly wrong.
folkert> So, my questions are:
folkert> - am I doing something and IS openssl threadsafe?
folkert> - is there an alternative for openssl doing which also
folkert> does the key-exchange for me?
Exactly what did you do? If you're trying to use the same SSL* in two
threads, it's quite true that you're screwed.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
