In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:13:31 +0100, "Folkert van 
Heusden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

folkert> I found out (yes, the rought way) that openssl is not
folkert> thread-safe: 2 threads doing encryption & decryption
folkert> concurrent goes horribly wrong.
folkert> So, my questions are:
folkert> - am I doing something and IS openssl threadsafe?
folkert> - is there an alternative for openssl doing which also
folkert>   does the key-exchange for me?

Exactly what did you do?  If you're trying to use the same SSL* in two
threads, it's quite true that you're screwed.


-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to