In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:13:31 +0100, "Folkert van Heusden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
folkert> I found out (yes, the rought way) that openssl is not folkert> thread-safe: 2 threads doing encryption & decryption folkert> concurrent goes horribly wrong. folkert> So, my questions are: folkert> - am I doing something and IS openssl threadsafe? folkert> - is there an alternative for openssl doing which also folkert> does the key-exchange for me? Exactly what did you do? If you're trying to use the same SSL* in two threads, it's quite true that you're screwed. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]